(Informal
Joint) Cabinet
|
|
Notes of informal
discussions of the SEBC/FHDC Cabinets held
on
Tuesday 14 November 2017 at
6.00 pm in the
Council Chamber, District Offices, College Heath
Road, Mildenhall, IP28 7EY
|
Present:
|
Councillors
|
|
St Edmundsbury Borough Council (SEBC)
|
|
John Griffiths
|
|
Robert Everitt
Sara Mildmay-White
Ian Houlder
|
Alaric Pugh
Peter Stevens
|
|
Forest Heath District Council
(FHDC)
|
|
James Waters (in the Chair for the informal
discussions)
|
|
David Bowman
Stephen Edwards
|
Robin Millar
Lance Stanbury
|
In attendance:
|
Mike Chester (SEBC)
|
Diane Hind (SEBC)
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the formal meeting,
informal discussions took place on the following substantive
items:
(1)
Recommendations of the SEBC/FHDC Overview and Scrutiny Committees
– 8 and 9 November 2017: Development of a West Suffolk Growth
Investment Strategy; and
(2) Technical
Advice Note: Space Standards for Residential
Development.
All Members of St Edmundsbury
Borough Council’s Cabinet had been invited to attend Forest
Heath District Council’s Offices at College Heath Road,
Mildenhall to enable joint informal discussions on the report to
take place between the two authorities, prior to seeking formal
approval at their respective separate Cabinet meetings, immediately
following the informal discussions.
The Chairman/Leader of Forest
Heath District Council, welcomed all those present to the District
Offices. The Service Manager
(Democratic Services) and Monitoring Officerfirstly advised on the
format of the proceedings for the informal discussions and
subsequent separate meetings of each authority.
Under their Constitutions, both
Cabinets listed as standing agenda items: an ‘Open
Forum’, which provided the opportunity for non-Cabinet
Members to discuss issues with Cabinet and also ‘Public
Participation’, which provided the opportunity for members of
the public to speak. Therefore, as any
matters arising from the discussions held during these agenda items
may have some bearing on the decisions taking during the separate
formal meetings, non-Cabinet Members and members of the public were
invited to put their questions/statements prior to the start of the
joint informal discussions.
1. Open
Forum
No non-Cabinet
Members in attendance wished to speak.
2. Public Participation
There were no members of the
public in attendance.
3.
Recommendations of the SEBC/FHDC Overview and Scrutiny
Committees – 8 and 9 November 2017: Development of a West
Suffolk Growth Investment Strategy
(Report Nos: CAB/SE/17/058 and
CAB/FH/17/055)
The Cabinets considered the
above report, which on the recommendation of the SEBC and FHDC
Overview and Scrutiny (O&S) Committees, sought endorsement of
the principles of the emerging West Suffolk Growth Investment
Strategy.
Approval of proposals to create
a revolving capital growth investment fund of £20 million
each, funded from external borrowing, to support the
Councils’ wider growth agenda, had been given by both
Councils in February 2017 as part of the budget and council tax
setting process. Subsequently, in March and April 2017, both
Cabinets each approved a £1 million revenue reserve to
facilitate next steps for progressing the growth agenda, together
with resolving that an overarching Growth Investment Strategy be
prepared.
Councillors Alaric Pugh and
Lance Stanbury, SEBC’s and FHDC’s respective Portfolio
Holders for Planning and Growth, drew relevant issues to the
attention of both Cabinets, including how the
new emerging Strategic Framework 2018-2020 would set the direction
and priorities for Growth, and it was therefore essential to
shaping the development of the overarching Growth Investment
Strategy.
An initial phase in the process
was to seek endorsement of a set of principles, which if agreed,
would inform the development of the Strategy. These proposed investment principles, as contained
in Appendix 1 attached to the report, had firstly been considered
by the West Suffolk Joint Growth Steering Group, and subsequently
by both O&S Committees. Members
noted that as the agenda and papers for this meeting had been
despatched and published prior to the convening of the O&S
Committee meetings, their proposed amendments to the principles (if
any) would be verbally reported at the meeting.
Councillors Pugh and Stanbury
acknowledged the thorough scrutiny of the principles undertaken by
the Committees and were pleased to note that the proposals had been
well received.
Councillor Diane Hind, Chairman
of SEBC’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee, commended the
Assistant Director for Growth’s presentation at the O&S
Committee meeting and stated that whilst a good debate was had, no
amendments had been recommended to the principles
themselves.
The recommendation set out on
page 2 of the report was unanimously supported by both
Cabinets.
4.
Technical Advice Note: Space Standards for Residential
Development
(Report Nos: CAB/SE/17/059 and
CAB/FH/17/056)
The Cabinets considered the
above report, which sought approval for the adoption of an interim
Technical Advice Note on Space Standards for Residential
Development.
Currently neither Forest Heath
nor St Edmundsbury Councils had within their development plans a
policy that required developers to adhere to constructing
properties to a minimum space standard, the implications of which
were provided in the report. Action was
considered requiring to be taken which had led to the production of
a proposed Technical Advice Note on Space Standards for Residential
Development, which was attached as Appendix A to the
report.
Councillor Sara Mildmay-White, West
Suffolk’s lead Portfolio Holder for Housing for both
Councils, drew relevant issues to the attention of the Cabinets,
including that a technical advice note should be adopted as it
would enable the Councils to advise developers to build properties
with regard to a minimum space standard in line with the
Government’s Nationally Described Space
Standards. It was envisaged that this
would become policy, with which the Councils could require housing
developers to comply, once a new joint West Suffolk Local Plan was
produced.
A detailed discussion was held and Members
were generally supportive of the interim Advice Note, and would
particularly welcome its adoption as policy within the new West
Suffolk Local Plan at the appropriate time.
Particular focus was given to paragraph 4.1
(m) of the Technical Advice Note contained in Appendix 1 regarding
shape, size and location of outside amenity space, and how this
should explicitly refer to garaging arrangements, particularly in
light of the size of some modern cars.
The recommendations set out on
page 2 of the report were unanimously supported by both
Cabinets.
On the conclusion of the
informal joint discussions at 6.22 pm, the Chairman then formally
opened the meeting of Forest Heath District Council’s Cabinet
at 6.22 pm in the Council Chamber.