Agenda and minutes

Forest Heath Development Control Committee - Wednesday 2 May 2018 6.00 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, District Offices, College Heath Road, Mildenhall, Suffolk IP28 7EY

Contact: Helen Hardinge  Email: helen.hardinge@westsuffolk.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

289.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Andrew Appleby, Ruth Bowman J.P and Simon Cole.  Councillor Louise Marston was also unable to attend the meeting.

290.

Substitutes

Minutes:

There were no substitutes present at the meeting.

291.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 133 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 7 March 2018 (copy attached).

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 7 March 2018 were unanimously received as a correct record and were signed by the Chairman.

292.

Planning Application DC/17/2676/FUL - Kininvie, Fordham Road, Newmarket pdf icon PDF 232 KB

Report No: DEV/FH/18/005

 

Planning Application - (i) 63no.bed Care Home for the Elderly including car park, bicycle, refuse and garden store (ii) Alterations to vehicular and pedestrian access from Fordham Road (Demolition of existing house including associated swimming pool, outbuildings and hard-standing)

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Planning Application – (i) 63no. bed Care Home for the Elderly including car park, bicycle, refuse and garden store (ii) Alterations to vehicular and pedestrian access from Fordham Road (Demolition of existing house including associated swimming pool, outbuildings and hard-standing)

 

This application was referred to the Development Control Committee given the recommendation to grant planning permission was contrary to views expressed by Newmarket Town Council that planning permission should be refused.

 

Officers were recommending that the application be approved, subject to the subsequent receipt of a report detailing the outcome of a further bat survey satisfactorily demonstrating that no specific mitigation measures for bats were required; and subject to conditions set out in paragraph 102 (and an additional condition reported at the meeting, as set out below).

 

The Principal Planning Officer reported the following updates to the report:

 

(a)     should planning permission be granted, the requested bat survey was expected to be carried out in June 2018.  Planning permission would only be issued if the Local Planning Authority was satisfied that no specific mitigation measures would be required;

 

(b)     in respect of the proposed Section 106 Agreement, which would seek a developer contribution of £9,936 towards health infrastructure, the applicants had already agreed to the principle of this figure, which had been ascertained as a result of the NHS Trust’s health impact assessment;

 

(c)     a correction to a typographical error within paragraph 81 of the report in respect of the table listing property addresses and separation distances.  The figures listed as relating to 6 Meynell Gardens actually related to 8 Meynell Gardens, and vice versa; and

 

(d)     an additional proposed condition, whereby should permission be granted, the development would need to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans.

 

Speakers:

 

(a)     Jill Rogers (resident) - spoke against the application

(b)     Bernard Spears (agent for applicant) - spoke in support of the application

 

Some concern was expressed regarding the following issues:

 

(a)     that the size and scale of the proposed building was too large and the scheme was an overdevelopment of the site;

(b)     the developer contribution under the proposed Section 106 agreement appeared to be a derisory amount;

(c)     the scheme appeared not to enhance the neighbouring Conservation Area;

(d)     the impact on the residential amenity during the construction period;

(e)     the proposed management of waste, such as the frequency of emptying wheelie bins, and the disposal of clinical waste;

(f)      the location for storing mobility scooters;

(g)     the proposed management of surface water run-off and drainage; and

(h)     the impact on the horse racing industry;

 

to which the Principal Planning Officer provided comprehensive responses,   reiterating the content of the report and/or presentation that had addressed the above concerns, or explaining that issues raised regarding (e) above could be addressed by imposing an additional condition. 

 

During the debate, a motion to grant planning permission (subject to receipt of the bat survey and conditions outlined above) was proposed by Councillor David Bowman, which was duly seconded by Councillor Louis Busuttil.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 292.