Agenda and minutes
Venue: To be held remotely via video conferencing facilities (Microsoft TeamsLive)
Contact: Christine Brain: Democratic Services Officer
Email: christine.brain@westsuffolk.gov.uk
Note: This will be a non-decision making virtual meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
Media
Items
No. |
Item |
106. |
Substitutes
Any member who is substituting for another
member should so indicate, together with the name of the relevant
absent member.
Minutes:
The following substitutions were declared:
Councillor John Burns substituting for
Councillor Michael Anderson.
Councillor Cliff Waterman substituting for
Councillor Diane Hind.
|
107. |
Apologies for absence
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Michael Anderson and Diane Hind.
|
108. |
Minutes PDF 220 KB
To review and note any amendments to the
minutes of the meeting held on 18 March 2021 (copy attached).
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting held on 18 March
2021 were reviewed and no amendments were noted. These minutes would be formally confirmed as a
correct record at the next meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny
Committee.
In response to a question raised by members
regarding whether a written response had been sent to Frank
Stennett relating to minute number 101 (public participation),
officers agreed to follow this action up.
|
109. |
Declarations of interest
Members are reminded of their responsibility
to declare any pecuniary or local non pecuniary interest which they
have in any item of business on the agenda, no later than when
that item is reached and, when appropriate, to leave the
meeting prior to discussion and voting on the item.
Minutes:
Members’ declarations of interest are
recorded under the item to which the declaration relates.
|
110. |
Announcements from the Chair regarding responses from the Cabinet to reports of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee
Minutes:
The Chair informed members he attended Cabinet
on 25 May 2021 and presented the Committee’s report from its
meeting held on 18 March 2021.
As per the minutes above, the Chair updated Cabinet
on the report presented on Exiting the
European Union: West Suffolk Council’s preparations and
current status and update on the Mildenhall Hub, which was
noted by Cabinet.
|
111. |
Public participation
Members of the public who live or work in the
district are welcome to speak and may ask one question or make a
statement of not more than three minutes duration relating to items
to be discussed in Part 1 of the agenda only. If a question is asked and answered within three
minutes, the person who asked the question may ask a supplementary
question that arises from the reply.
As this meeting is being held virtually and to
allow persons sufficient time to be briefed on procedures
accordingly, a person who wishes to speak must register by 9am
on the last working day before the meeting (Wednesday 9 June
2021).
There is an overall limit of 15 minutes for
public speaking, which may be extended at the Chair’s
discretion.
Minutes:
No members of the public had registered to
speak.
|
112. |
Western Suffolk Community Safety Partnership Monitoring Report (April 2020 to March 2021) PDF 215 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/006
The Chair of the Western Suffolk Community
Safety Partnership, Councillor Joanna Spicer has been invited to
the meeting to present the report to the Committee.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
[The Chair of the Committee, Councillor Ian
Shipp experienced ongoing technical IT issues during the
consideration of this item. To ensure
the MS TeamsLive meeting was able to continue, the Vice-Chair,
Councillor Stephen Frost took over chairing the meeting, with
Councillor Ian Shipp joining the remainder of the meeting via the
telephone].
It was the duty of the Committee, as the
Council’s Crime and Disorder Committee designated under the
Police and Justice Act 2006, to scrutinise the work of the
Partnership.
The Committee received Report No:
OAS/WS/21/006, presented by the Chair of the Western Suffolk
Community Safety Partnership, Councillor Joanna Spicer, and the
Council’s Cabinet Member for Families and Communities,
Councillor Robert Everitt.
The report set out the background to the
partnership and the statutory bodies involved which Councillor
Joanna Spicer expanded on. She
explained that the WSCSP covered a large geographical area, which
included a number of important organisations, and updated Members
on the community safety activity in West Suffolk, including the
work of the Western Suffolk Community Safety Partnership (WSCSP)
for 2019-2022. Councillor Spicer
confirmed that West Suffolk had a new Western Area Commander,
Superintendent Janine Wratten who was introducing herself by making
contact with councillors and other organisations.
Over the past year the WSCSP had continued to
meet and discharge its statutory duties by carrying out an annual
assessment of crime and disorder in the area, continuing to deliver
the three-year plan and action plan to reflect the priorities of
the partnership, and carrying out Domestic Homicide Reviews.
Attached at Appendix A to the report, was the
WSCSP Plan 2019-2022, which was required to reflect the Suffolk
Police and Crime Plan published by the Police and Crime
Commissioner.
A review of the WSCSP action plan and
strategic assessment was completed in June 2020 and following
discussions with statutory partners the strategic assessment and
action plan was formally agreed by the WSCSP Responsible
Authorities in September 2020.
Based on the outcomes of partnership discussions,
the following priorities remained the focus of the
WSCSP:
-
County Lines.
-
Violence against women and girls (including men and
boys).
-
Hate Crime.
-
Prevent.
-
Domestic homicide reviews.
Councillor Joanna Spicer wanted
to thank Councillor Robert Everitt for his support over the past
year, and welcomed Councillor Trevor Beckwith who would be
joining the WSCSP, representing West Suffolk Council, following the
sad passing of Councillor Jim Meikle.
Finally, Councillor Joanna Spicer wished to
thank Lesley-Ann Keogh (Families and Communities Team Leader) on
producing the report through a challenging year, both in supporting
the WSCSP and West Suffolk Council in her Covid work.
The Committee considered the report
in detail and asked a number of questions to which comprehensive
responses were provided by Councillor Spicer and
officers.
In response to a question raised
regarding paragraph 2.2 in the report “violence against women
and girls including men and boys”, members felt this was an
unusual acronym and asked whether this could be expressed in a
better way. Officers explained this worked linked to
...
view the full minutes text for item 112.
|
113. |
Collection of Council Tax and Business Rates PDF 339 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/007
Mr
Paul Corney, Head of Anglia Revenues
Partnership has been invited to the meeting to present the report
to the Committee.
Minutes:
[Councillor Simon Brown left the meeting at
6.09pm during the consideration of this item].
Prior to presenting the report, Paul Corney,
Head of Anglia Revenues Partnership (ARP) explained it was a
partnership of five councils being Fenland District Council, East
Cambridgeshire District Council, East Suffolk Council, West Suffolk
Council and Breckland District Council.
ARP dealt with the collection of council tax and business rates and
awarded housing benefits and council tax support for the partner
councils.
Mr Corney the presented report number
OAS/WS/21/007, which set out the approach to council tax and
business rates debt recovery. The
report informed the Committee on how the Covid-19 pandemic had
impacted on business rates and council tax recovery, and how the
recovery approaches have had to be flexed accordingly during the
last year and into 2021 to support residents and businesses.
The report included information on its debt
recovery approach; Covid-19 impact on recovery processes and
collection; re-starting recovery; comparison of arrears and
challenges for 2021, which was accompanied by a PowerPoint
presentation.
The Committee considered the report and asked
questions to which comprehensive responses were provided.
In response to a question raised as to whether
there was likely to be any government intervention and support when
furlough and self-employed income support ended in September 2021
to help with genuine hardship which might occur and the impact of
income to the council, which might be severe, Paul Corney explained
that ARP was yet to see what the impact might be. The Bank of England’s most recent
projections were more optimistic than they had been suggesting in
that unemployment might not rise by as much as they had originally
thought, and that the economy could bounce back a lot
quicker. However, it would be a waiting
game to understand how good the bounce back would be and on how
many people become unemployed through the impact of covid on
businesses.
In response to a question raised on how well
West Suffolk Council compared with other areas for debt collection
due to Covid-19, Paul Corney explained that the council had
performed well compare to other Suffolk authorities. However, there was a picture across the country of
everyone suffering collection wise, with certain areas hit harder
than others. Within the same period
last year, the government was helping councils by helping to fund
the loss of income, such as council tax. However, it was going to be interesting moving
forward as there were potentially a number of people with more
arrears than they would have had in previous years and therefore
ARP needed to be especially sensitive to the position that people
had been put in through no fault of their own due to
Covid. ARP was only two months into the
collection year and arrears from previous years were being paid,
which ARP would continue to monitor.
At the conclusion of discussions, and there
being no decision required, the Committee noted the contents
of the report.
|
114. |
Website Review Group Findings PDF 132 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/008
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received report
number OAS/WS/21/008, which set out the findings from the
Website Working Party. The Group was
set up following a work programme suggestion submitted by
Councillor Terry Clements, attached as Appendix 1.
The Working Group comprised four councillors
and met on three occasions to understand data on how the website
was used; discuss their experience of using the website and agree
an action plan. Between meetings
members of the Group tested the website, including attempting to
undertake the 10 most commonly used website functions and testing
“Find My Nearest”. At its
last meeting the Group considered progress made on an Action Plan,
which was developed during its second meeting (Appendix 2).
The Group had identified 15 improvements
(Appendix 2) as result of its work, and subject to endorsement by
the Committee, these were with officers to progress. Some of the actions had already been completed or
were in progress.
Councillor Robert Everitt, Cabinet Member for
Families and Communities wished to thank Councillor Terry Clements
and the Overview and Scrutiny Committee for allowing the Working
Group to carry out this piece of work and to officers for guiding
the Working Group through the process.
The Committee considered the
report and asked questions to which responses were
provided.
In response to a question
raised as to whether there was a requirement in law to have pages
on its website in different languages, officers explained that
there was no requirement by law to provide alternative languages as
people mainly used their own language readers. The council did have a contract which made it
cheaper, with a company called “language line” who were
qualified translators, for example to translate documents when
required. On its website, the council
had an accessibility statement, and it tried to be as compliant as
possible with accessibility requirements. Officers are able to undertake weekly reviews of
accessibility compliance. A selection
of officers across the council had also been trained as editors in
uploading accessible documents and making sure information was up
to date.
In response to a question asked
as to whether the council’s website had been created
in-house, officers explained that the website was predominantly
maintained by council staff.
In response to a question
raised as to why councillors were not asked for their input, the
Chair of the Work Group, Councillor Stephen Frost, referred members
to the original terms of the review and
to Appendix 2, recommended action 15 being proposed to
“inform councillors of where they can raise website issues
and improvements within the council”, which would be an
ongoing aspect of keeping the website up to date. This was
specifically included to ensure that in future Councillors would
have a clear avenue through which to raise any concerns they may
hold about the website.
Discussions were also held on
the planning portal, links to other organisations websites and
search words (terminology used), to which responses were
provided.
At the conclusion of
discussions, the Committee endorsed the action plan developed by
the Website ...
view the full minutes text for item 114.
|
115. |
Review of Council Markets - Terms of Reference PDF 115 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/009
Additional documents:
Minutes:
[Councillor Joe Mason left the meeting at
6.57pm during the consideration of this item].
The Committee received report number
OAS/WS/21/009, which set out the proposed terms of reference for
the markets review. It was proposed
that five members be nominated to sit on the Working Group, which
would be supported by officers to find out more about the current
market trading environment, engagement would be held with key
stakeholders and research undertaken, with a view to then forming a
view on the strategic direction of the markets.
Councillor Ian Shipp explained that it was
important that the Working Group looked at the markets
strategically. The proposed five
members would need to be committed to the review. The review was about looking at how the council
could sustain markets for the future and put himself forward to sit
in the Working Group.
Councillor Paul Hopfensperger suggested having
market traders sitting on the Working Group as co-optees alongside
members. In response, officers
explained that the council needed to engage with the various
stakeholders in the right way.
Furthermore, Councillor Ian Shipp suggested holding a market trader
specific meeting. Market traders would
be able to feed information throughout the review process.
Councillor Marion Rushbrook suggested
increasing the proposed membership on the Working Group from five
to six, so all of the market towns were cover. In response officers explained it was useful to
have that representation, but the markets review was about the
whole of West Suffolk’s strategic vision. Looking at the membership of the Committee, there
were no Brandon members on Overview and Scrutiny, but officers
could see after the meeting if any Brandon members would be
interested in sitting on the Group.
At the conclusion of the discussions, the
Overview and Scrutiny Committee endorses the terms of
reference as attached at Appendix 1, subject to increasing the
membership to six members, and nominated the following members to
sit on the Markets Review Group:
1) Ian Shipp
(Mildenhall)
2) John Burns
(Haverhill)
3) Marion Rushbrook (Smaller
Markets/Clare)
4) Patrick Chung (Bury St
Edmunds)
It was also advised that
following the meeting, the Chair and officers would speak with
Councillor Anderson to see if he wished to be on the Working Group
for Newmarket (and if not, seek an alternative member
representative for Newmarket), as well as Brandon members to seek a
nomination.
[Councillor Sarah Pugh left the meeting at
7.11pm following the conclusion of this item.
Councillor Paul Hopfensperger left the meeting
at 7.13pm following the conclusion of this item].
|
116. |
Cabinet Decisions Plan: 1 June 2021 to 31 May 2022 PDF 152 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/010
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received report number:
OAS/WS/21/010, which informed members on forthcoming decisions to
be considered by the Cabinet for the period 1 June 2021 to 31 May
2022.
The Committee considered the Decision Plan, in
particular “Public Access to West Suffolk Council
Offices” being considered by Cabinet on 29 June
2021. Councillor Burns had read the
proposals for staff working and asked how that would interact with
public access and staff being in the office to see people, and
whether that was covered in the proposed report to
Cabinet. Officers explained that the
council was working through the Government’s rules and
regulations and was looking at various options for the different
offices, how people access our services and taking lessons learnt
from the past year, which would tie in with the decision made about
staff coming back into the offices.
There being no decision required, the
Committee noted the contents of the 1 June 2021 to
31 May 2022 Decisions Plan.
|
117. |
Work Programme Update and Councillor Call for Action Submission PDF 135 KB
Report number: OAS/WS/21/011
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received report number:
OAS/WS/21/011, which updated members on the current status of its
rolling work programme of items for scrutiny during 2021-2022
(Appendix 1), the submission of a Councillor Call for Action (CCfA)
request by Councillor Trevor Beckwith and the nomination of at
least one member to the Modern-day Slavery Working Group.
Councillor Trevor Beckwith introduced the CCfA
entitled “Impact of the Eastern Relief Road and A14 Junction
45 on the Moreton Hall Residential Area, attached at Appendix 2 to
the report. Councillor Beckwith
referred to the CCfA Protocol and explained that his submission met
the requirements of the Protocol as the matter directly affected
his ward; accepted that there was no guarantee of a successful
resolution but was optimistic that the Committee would consider the
issues and merit recommendations; and the CCfA was the last resort
and had provided evidence set out in Appendices 2 – 7 that
all relevant mechanisms and resources available had been
exhausted.
Councillor Beckwith explained that the
construction of the Eastern Relief Road was a joint venture between
Suffolk County Council, the then St Edmundsbury Borough Council and
the LEP, to provide access to the huge expansion at Suffolk
Park/Suffolk Business Park.
Additionally, Junction 45 of the A14 trunk road underwent a major
upgrade to improve access to the new road. The project cost was estimated to be £15m
but there was an overspend of £4.8m. Much of the overspend was to comply with Highway
England requirements at Junction 45.
The business parks include massive warehousing and distribution
centres that generate increasing numbers of HGV
journeys. Unfortunately, the HGV
increase was adversely impacting on several residential areas of
the Moreton Hall estate despite the junction upgrade.
Documents attached to the CCfA demonstrated
that all reasonable attempts to resolve the issue had been taken
over the last three years, but the responses demonstrate that the
matter was not being progressed. This was not part of a personal
agenda but the response by an elected member to the frustration and
annoyance at the avoidable loss of amenity for a large section of
the residential community.
Councillor Beckwith hoped the committee would
agree to a formal hearing so it could hear from local residents, a
representative from the local residents’ association and
representatives from the business parks, increasing reasons to be
optimistic that the committee would be able to make recommendations
to benefit all concerned. This was a
reputational issue for everyone involved.
Councillor Cliff Waterman supported the CCfA
requested and explained the issue also impacted on his ward and
acknowledged there was a high level of frustration with
resident’s and agreed it was a reputational
issue.
Other members of the Committee also indicated
they supported Councillor Beckwith’s CCfA submission for
inclusion in its forward work programme.
The Committee then considered the request to
nominate at least one new member from the Overview and Scrutiny
Committee to replace Councillor Ingwall-King on the Modern-Day
Slavery Working Group who resigned as a West Suffolk Councillor in
March ...
view the full minutes text for item 117.
|
|
In this section
|