Report No: DEV/FH/17/041
Planning Application - 39 no. dwellings with an area of open space, associated landscaping, access and engineering works (demolition of existing dwelling and associated outbuildings)
Minutes:
Planning Application - 39 no. dwellings with an area of open space, associated landscaping, access and engineering works (demolition of existing dwelling and associated outbuildings)
This application was referred to the Development Control Committee because it was for a major application and because the Parish Council objected to the proposal.
A Member site visit was held prior to the meeting. Officers were recommending that the application be approved subject to conditions, as set out in Paragraph 79 of Report No DEV/FH/17/041.
The Principal Planning Officer made her presentation which included visuals of; landscaping, visibility splays, elevations and street scenes. Attention was also drawn to noise contour mapping in light of the proposed dwellings being under the flight path from RAF Lakenheath.
Attention was drawn to Paragraph 10 of the report in which the S106 contributions required for primary education were stipulated as being for West Row Community Primary School. The Officer explained that West Row would be the catchment school in respect of the contributions from this development, if approved, because Beck Row Primary School had already been allocated the maximum number of contributions from other approved developments.
The Principal Planning Officer also advised of the following corrections/amendments to the report (relevant agenda page numbers as indicated):
· Condition 2 – revision number in relation to block 5 was incorrect – this should be ‘P03’ (Page 36) and the visibility splay drawing number should have revision P01 on the end;
· Condition 6 – word ‘not’ to be deleted (double negative – Page 38);
· SCC Archaeological Service confirmed that Condition 9 (Page 39) was no longer required as all archaeological works and reporting had now been completed;
· Condition 13 – Officer note – wording agreed with Anglian Water (Page 41);
· Condition 23 – slight reword at the beginning; ‘The dwellings hereby approved shall not be occupied…’ (Page 43);
· Condition 24 – Vis splay plan No. missing; 31429-IW-XX-XX-DR-A-2001 P01 (Page 43-44);
· Condition 30 – insert ‘(shown on the Tree Reference Plan by ACD Environmental; drawing ORB21002-01B)’ after ‘T14’ to make the condition more precise (Page 45); and
· Condition 34 – delete the word ‘residential’ (Page 46).
Speakers: Annette Dawson (resident) spoke against the application;
Nicole Perryman (agent) spoke in support of the application
Members asked a number of questions in relation to; defined need, school capacity, density of the scheme, elevations and maintenance of driveways. All of which were responded to by the Case Officer and the Service Manager (Planning – Development).
Councillor David Bowman spoke as Ward Member for the application and voiced support for the scheme which would provide much needed affordable housing. He moved that the application be approved, as per the Officer recommendation and inclusive of the identified amendments, and this was duly seconded by Councillor Simon Cole.
Upon being put to the vote, and with the vote being unanimous, it was resolved that
Decision
Planning permission be GRANTED subject to the completion of a Section 106 Agreement to secure the following Heads of Terms, and subject to the following conditions:
HEADS OF TERMS:
· 100% affordable housing (39 dwellings)
· Public open space contribution for improvements at Aspal Close nature reserve - £59,670
· Library contribution - £608
· Pre-school - £24,364
· Primary - £85,267
CONDITIONS:
· Details of further infiltration testing on site in accordance with BRE 365 to verify the permeability of the site (trial pits to be located where soakaways are proposed and repeated runs for each trial hole). Borehole records should also be submitted in support of soakage testing.
· Dimensioned plans illustrating all aspects of the surface water drainage scheme including location and size of infiltration devices and the conveyance network. A statement on the amount of impermeable area served by each soakaway should also be illustrated on the plans and should be cross referenceable with associated soakaway calculations.
· Modelling results (or similar method) to demonstrate that the infiltration device has been adequately sized to contain the critical 100yr+CC event for the catchment area they serve. Each device should be designed using the nearest tested infiltration rate to which they are located. A suitable factor of safety should be applied to the infiltration rate during design.
· Infiltration devices should be no more than 2m deep and will have at least 1.2m of unsaturated ground between base of the device and the groundwater table. If individual soakaways are being used they will be at least 5m away from any foundation (depending on whether chalk is present).
· Only clean water will be disposed of by infiltration devices due to the site being close to a Source Protection Zone. Demonstration of adequate treatment stages for water quality control shall be submitted- SuDS features should demonstrate betterment to water quality, especially if discharging towards a watercourse or aquifer.
· Infiltration devices will have a half drain time of less than 24hours (this can be relaxed to where it can demonstrated that the system has spare capacity for a subsequent 10yr storm within 24hrs).
· Modelling of conveyance networks showing no above ground flooding in 1 in 30 year event, plus any potential volumes of above ground flooding during the 1 in 100 year rainfall + CC.
· Topographic plans shall be submitted depicting safe exceedance flow paths in case of a blockage within the main SW system and/or flows in excess of a 1 in 100 year rainfall event. These flow paths will demonstrate that the risks to people and property are kept to a minimum.
· A management and maintenance plan for the lifetime of the development which shall include the arrangements for adoption by any public body or statutory undertaker, or any other arrangements to secure the operation of the sustainable drainage system throughout its lifetime.
· Arrangements to enable any surface water drainage within any private properties to be accessible and maintained including information and advice on responsibilities to be supplied to future owners.
i. A site investigation scheme (based on the approved Preliminary Risk Assessment (PRA) within the approved Desk Study), to provide information for a detailed assessment of the risk to all receptors that may be affected, including those off site.
ii. The results of a site investigation based on i) and a detailed risk assessment, including a revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM).
iii. Based on the risk assessment in ii), an options appraisal and remediation strategy giving full details of the remediation measures required and how they are to be undertaken. The strategy shall include a plan providing details of how the remediation works shall be judged to be complete and arrangements for contingency actions. The plan shall also detail a long term monitoring and maintenance plan as necessary.
No occupation of any part of the permitted development shall take place until a verification report demonstrating completion of works set out in the remediation strategy in iii) is submitted and approved, in writing, by the Local Planning Authority. The long term monitoring and maintenance plan in iii) shall be updated and be implemented as approved.
If, during development, contamination not previously identified is found to be present at the site then no further development (unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority) shall be carried out until the developer has submitted a remediation strategy to the local planning authority detailing how this unsuspected contamination shall be dealt with and obtained written approval from the local planning authority. The remediation strategy shall be implemented as approved.
Where possible the fencing shall be erected outside the 'Root Protection Area' (RPA) defined by a radius of dbh x 12 where dbh is the diameter of the trunk measured at a height of 1.5m above ground level and shall consist of robust wooden stakes connected by robust wooden cross members to a height of not less than 1.2 metres. Where fencing cannot be erected outside the RPA an arboricultural method statement shall be submitted and approved in writing in accordance with the relevant condition. Within the fenced area no work shall take place; no materials shall be stored; no oil or other chemicals shall be stored or disposed of; no concrete, mortar or plaster shall be mixed; no fires shall be started; no service trenches shall be dug; no soil shall be removed or ground level changed at any time, without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority.
20. An upgrade of the existing footway to a width of 1.8m, between the site boundary with ‘Ashlands’ and the junction with Aspal Lane is required to create a safe pedestrian link from the proposed development into Beck Row. This will include a dropped crossing point across Aspal Lane. The extended footway shall be constructed with falls away from Wilde Street to direct water into the existing shallow ditch located along the site boundary, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. This work should be carried out within a section 278 agreement. Prior to any development commencing above slab level, the following should be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority:
i) A plan showing the extended footway and location of the UKPN underground cable
ii) Details of the means of surface water drainage from the extended footpath to the existing shallow ditch along the site boundary, or any alternative solution agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 2 Class A of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no obstruction over 0.6 metres high shall be erected, constructed, planted or permitted to grow within the areas of the visibility splays.
a) A licence issued by Natural England pursuant to regulation 53 of The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, authorising the demolition to go ahead; or
b) A statement in writing from the relevant licensing body to the effect that it does not consider that the demolition will require a licence.
· Updated reptile survey information as appropriate;
· Method statement for site clearance;
· Location of habitats to be retained and protected;
· Working methods including storage of materials, escape routes from excavations;
· Location and method of habitat enhancement and creation;
· Location and creation of hibernacula and refuges;
· Phasing of the above;
· Monitoring
The measures shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the approved scheme.
i) Details of the development that demonstrate that for each unoccupied dwelling and its associated sound insulation that noise levels with windows closed shall not exceed a daytime level of 35dB LAeq (16hrs) within living rooms between 07.00 and 23.00 hours, and a night-time level of 30 dB LAeq (8hrs) within bedrooms between 23.00 and 07.00 hours, using the methodology advocated within BS 8233:2014 ‘Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings’ (2014). The development shall adopt the proposed sound insulation measures as stated, and;
ii) Details of a measurement and assessment methodology for demonstrating compliance with the limits set out in i), including the identification of specific properties where monitoring shall take place. This methodology shall include measurements within more than one dwelling.
(Councillor Stephen Edwards joined the meeting at 6.18pm during the preliminary discussion of this item and prior to the voting thereon.)
Supporting documents: