Settlement is required for a matter directly relevant to enforcement and to prevent escalation to the Ombudsman. Details cannot be revealed as they could prejudice enforcement and identify individuals causing prejudice to the Council and third parties.
Given the timeframe that is being worked to resolve this matter, it has not been possible to provide for 28 days notice of the decision. Under the Access to Information Procedure Rules of the Council’s Constitution, paragraph 16.1 relates to a Key Decision (which this is) and the consideration of matters in private, requires that where the normal procedure cannot be followed, the Chairman of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee is to be informed as to why the taking of the decision cannot be reasonably deferred. This has been undertaken accordingly.
Decision type: Key
Reason Key: SE - significant in terms of its effects on communities;
Decision status: Recommmend Forward to Council
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Notice of proposed decision first published: 29/11/2016
This item is subject to the General Exception procedure. It is proposed to take a key decision and/or consider an item in private session on the decision date shown below. It would be impracticable to defer the decision until it has been included on the next Decisions Plan. This notice has been issued by the Assistant Director (HR, Legal and Democratic Services). Appropriate discussions have been held with the Chair of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee and agreement sought for the intended decision to be made by the expected date, where necessary.
Reason for urgency:
Settlement is required for a matter directly relevant to enforcement and to prevent escalation to the Ombudsman. Details cannot be revealed as they could prejudice enforcement and identify individuals causing prejudice to the Council and third parties.
Given the timeframe that is being worked to resolve this matter, it has not been possible to provide for 28 days notice of the decision. Under the Access to Information Procedure Rules of the Council’s Constitution, paragraph 16.1 relates to a Key Decision (which this is) and the consideration of matters in private, requires that where the normal procedure cannot be followed, the Chairman of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee is to be informed as to why the taking of the decision cannot be reasonably deferred. This has been undertaken accordingly.
It is anticipated that this report will contain information which is exempt from publication and during discussion of this information the public may be excluded from the meeting. View the reasons for the exemption
If you wish to make representations that the public should not be excluded from the meeting during discussion of this item please write to the Service Manager (Democratic Services) stating the reasons why you think the discussion should be held in public
Decision due: 8 Dec 2016 by St Edmundsbury Cabinet
Lead member: Councillor Alaric Pugh alaric.pugh@westsuffolk.gov.uk
Contact: Steven Wood, Head of Planning and Growth 01284 757306.
Type of Decision: (KD) - This decision would potentially be significant in terms of its effect on communities
Documents to be submitted: Exempt report to Cabinet